Confirmation bias in project management is a common but often unnoticed risk. It’s the human tendency to seek out evidence that supports our existing beliefs, while ignoring information that challenges them. For project managers, this bias can influence decisions about scope, budget, timelines, and risk, ultimately affecting project outcomes.
Even with strong technical skills and well-defined project controls, bias can creep in. It may stem from pressure to deliver, confidence in past projects, or assumptions based on past successes. Left unchecked, it can distort judgement and lead teams down the wrong path.
In this article, we’ll explore how to recognise and address confirmation bias, and offer practical ways to avoid, combat, and mitigate its effects, helping you protect decision quality and improve project success.
Let’s get started!
Confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias that affects how people gather and interpret information. In project management, it describes the tendency to prioritise data that supports existing beliefs, while overlooking evidence that contradicts them.
It often appears early, such as during the development of an initial estimate or business case. Influences may include pressure to justify funding, prior success, or a strong belief in a specific solution.
Importantly, this bias doesn’t suggest poor intent. It affects even experienced project professionals, leading teams to make decisions that aren’t rooted in current reality. Recognising confirmation bias in project management helps project professionals move from reactive to reflective decision-making.
Left unchecked, it can cause poor risk identification, underestimated budget needs, and missed chances to improve efficiency. Recognising it early is critical to maintaining quality decision-making throughout the project lifecycle.
Projects often move fast, and decisions must be made under pressure. In this context, confirmation bias can distort how teams assess risk or evaluate progress. Teams may continue with flawed plans simply because they believe in them, even when new evidence suggests a course correction is needed.
This bias can also lead to cost overruns, timeline slips, and misaligned deliverables. Input from stakeholders or external experts may be dismissed if it challenges the team’s original assumptions.
When team members don’t feel empowered to share diverse perspectives, blind spots persist. Collaboration suffers, and the chance of project success decreases.
To reduce the effects of confirmation bias in project management, leaders must be willing to challenge assumptions and stay open to new information.
This section explores how confirmation bias in project management manifests at both the individual and group level. Project managers may focus too heavily on data that confirms their expectations. Within teams, groupthink can emerge, making it harder to raise concerns or propose alternatives.
Relying on past successes without evaluating whether the current situation is truly similar can lead to repeating ineffective solutions. Feedback that doesn’t align with the team’s beliefs may be ignored, especially when deadlines or funding pressure is high.
Over time, this limits learning, stifles innovation, and prevents teams from fully exploring better solutions.
Spotting confirmation bias in the moment can be difficult, especially when time is limited and decisions feel urgent. But certain behaviours and thought patterns can act as warning signs.
Here’s a practical checklist to help project managers reflect on their own thinking and recognise when bias might be influencing decisions:
Keeping this checklist close at hand can help you recognise confirmation bias in project management before it influences key decisions.
It’s not about avoiding all mistakes, but about creating space to reflect and reduce the risk of poor decisions before they impact project outcomes.
Confirmation bias is one of the most common traps in project work, but it’s not the only one. Project managers and teams regularly face other cognitive biases that shape how they assess risk, manage budget, or decide whether to keep proceeding with a plan.
Here are six other biases worth watching for, and how they might affect your project decisions:
Your mood influences your judgment.
On a stressful day, you might rate a low-risk issue as critical. On a good day, you may underestimate real threats. This can affect how you prioritise tasks and allocate resources.
The way a problem is presented shapes your response.
If a risk is framed in terms of loss, people are more likely to take drastic action. If it’s framed as a potential gain, they may avoid action altogether — even when the implications are serious.
Recent or memorable events feel more important than they are.
If a recent incident caused concern, similar risks might get exaggerated attention. Meanwhile, less visible but more likely risks could be ignored.
Assuming the future will resemble the past.
Just because something hasn’t happened before doesn’t mean it won’t. This mindset can blind teams to potential issues and reduce preparedness for unexpected events.
Overestimating the likelihood of positive outcomes.
This can cause teams to underestimate cost overruns, downplay delivery challenges, or ignore signs that a project is off track.
Continuing a project just because you’ve already invested time or money.
Rather than pivoting when needed, teams may stick to a failing course simply because they’ve already spent resources on it.
Once you recognise that confirmation bias exists in your project environment, the next step is to take deliberate action to reduce its influence. While no method is perfect, there are proven ways to build habits and workflows that help you and your project team think more objectively.
You could use this checklist to help combat confirmation bias in your project decision-making processes. These actions are designed to help reduce the influence of confirmation bias in project management across all phases of delivery:
Implementing these approaches can help project managers slow down, reflect, and reduce the risks associated with biased thinking. While you can’t remove bias entirely, you can make it visible, and that alone can improve project outcomes, reduce errors, and support stronger decision-making.
While individual habits matter, lasting change comes from building bias-awareness into your project environment. These strategies help teams and organisations reduce confirmation bias over time:
These approaches take time to embed, but they help improve decision quality, protect against flawed thinking, and support long-term project success.
Confirmation bias in project management is easy to overlook but hard to ignore once you know the signs. From overconfidence in an initial estimate to filtering out negative feedback, the bias can quietly influence decisions and lead even skilled project professionals off course.
Recognising this human tendency is the first step. From there, project managers can take practical steps to challenge assumptions, invite diverse perspectives, and embed long-term strategies for bias resistance into their processes.
Whether you’re improving team discussions or refining your project controls, the benefits of confronting bias are clear: fewer mistakes, clearer thinking, and better project outcomes.
By staying aware of confirmation bias in project management, leaders can create a culture that values critical thinking, adaptability, and evidence.
No one can remove bias entirely. But with the right tools, awareness, and mindset, you can reduce its impact and lead your team toward more confident, evidence-based decisions.
Image Sources: Astrid.IQ
Our products help you deliver successful change programmes and projects by always focusing on the overall business outcomes. Find out how our products can help you.
Tell me more Request a DemoAre you struggling to understand how to plan a project that keeps you and your team on target? In th...
Read more >