There are host of Project, Portfolio Management (PPM) tools available in today’s marketplace. It is critical that you take steps to select the right PPM tool as the wrong choice can have a negative impact on the PMO.
This white paper outlines some of the key measures necessary to select the tool, and solution, that is fit for purpose and delivers or exceeds your anticipated business benefits.
The following advice can be applied to any industry, but please note that there are also certain PPM tools that have been specifically designed for key sectors, like our NHS PPM Tool.
PPM tools can be seen by senior management as a silver bullet for a number of business problems, e.g. selecting the optimum project portfolio for an organisation to invest in, or to improve governance of projects, or improve the way resources are managed.
Step 1 therefore is to define and agree with the Sponsor and senior stakeholders the business objectives of the PPM solution you are aiming to meet.
It may seem basic, but this critical step is often overlooked.
Once the objectives are clear you must now define your scope in more detail.
An effective way to do this is to use the ‘MoSCoW’ rules of features prioritisation that are often used in Agile developments, i.e.:
MoSCoW
M – MUST: Describes a feature that must be included in the final solution for the solution to be considered a success.
S – SHOULD: Represents a high-priority feature that should be included in the solution if it is possible within the available time/resources/budget, but which can be deferred/omitted without compromising the success of the solution.
C – COULD: Represents a feature that would be useful and could be included in the solution if it is possible within the available time/resources/budget, but which can be deferred/omitted without compromising the success of the solution.
W – WON’T: Represents a feature that stakeholders have agreed will not be implemented initially but may be considered for the future.
It is tempting to go for the most expansive scope but using MoSCoW rules helps to focus on the really important and critical ones.
Please remember that the bigger the scope, the bigger (usually) the cost of the tool and subsequent implementation project.
It is tempting to develop a tools shortlist rather than a solutions shortlist.
A critical success factor of implementing a PPM tool is to work with a solution provider who understands not just PPM, but also your business and the most effective way to support you in your PPM implementation.
You can select the best functionally rich tool in the marketplace but if the implementation partner does not have capability, resource, or cultural fit then it is highly likely that your PPM project will not succeed.
Avoid just looking at the research papers of the large IT research companies like Gartner and Forrester.
They do have useful research about the market but invariably they focus on the major suppliers of complex ‘full function’ PPM
tools to huge corporations – and these may not be appropriate for your organisation (or budget).
You could also use Google or LinkedIn forums to review the marketplace.
One word of caution here is that some PPM vendors are literally ‘one-man bands’ and it is always advisable to do a simple credit and capability check on vendors.
Also, can a one-man band really give you the support that you need for a PPM implementation project?
Whether it is a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process or a less informal set of requests and presentations, then it is essential that each vendor demonstrates their system to you.
Ideally, they will focus on your areas of mandatory (the MoSCoW Must Have) requirements.
Be careful of the shiny, slick sales pitch. They may know the product inside-out, but will they be available and onboard during the crucial implementation process?
Demonstrations should also include the key staff who would be involved in your project.
During the selection period you should:
The pilot should pick a reasonably receptive area of the business that will look on a new PPM tool with a positive frame of mind.
It defeats the object of a pilot if you select a business area who wants the pilot to fail as it WILL fail with this mentality.
Self-explanatory, I think!
A PPM implementation project is a major change project and needs to be managed as one. Plan for sustainability.
It is a mistake to think that tool implementation followed by training is sufficient to achieve the benefits that you set out in Step 1.
You should plan for resources to be expended so that the importance and the benefits of the PPM solution are regularly reinforced by sponsors and senior stakeholders.
We have seen many examples of PPM solutions delivering real business benefits to organisations.
However, there are also many examples of expensive PPM solutions being heroic failures costing millions and used as a glorified timesheet or planning system.
If you follow the 7 steps above, then you would be on the right path to deliver real business value for your PPM project.
We have implemented many PPM solutions, mainly using our PPM tool, PM3.
For more information, please contact info@bestoutcome.com or call us on +44 (0)1753 885864
About the author
David Walton – I am David Walton, Programme, Project and Portfolio Management specialist and director of Bestoutcome here in the UK. We make the PMO tools PM3, PM3time and PM3NHS, the only PMO tools designed by practitioners for practitioners
Our products help you deliver successful change programmes and projects by always focusing on the overall business outcomes. Find out how our products can help you
Tell me more Request a demo